PILLAR_P07 LIVE QUARTERLY REVIEW

The protocols shaping the agentic era.

MCP. A2A. Apps SDK. The protocol war is real, and the answer affects how you build for the next 5 years. Plain English, honest take.

4 standards tracked
ANTHROPIC EST. 2024-11

MCP

Model Context Protocol

Open protocol for connecting AI agents to external tools, data sources, and apps. The most likely-to-stick tool-connection protocol of 2026, with cross-vendor support.

ADOPTION ESTABLISHED
WHY YOU CARE

If you're building agents in 2026, MCP is the most likely-to-stick way to give them tools.

Open spec file
GOOGLE EST. 2025

A2A

Agent-to-Agent Protocol

Protocol for agents to discover and delegate to other agents. Useful for multi-agent systems and sub-task handoff.

ADOPTION GROWING
WHY YOU CARE

Important if you're building multi-agent systems. Watch this space.

Open spec file
OPENAI EST. 2025

Apps SDK

OpenAI Apps SDK

OpenAI's framework for building apps inside ChatGPT. It uses MCP-style servers for tools and adds ChatGPT-specific UI/widget rendering.

ADOPTION GROWING
WHY YOU CARE

If your audience lives in ChatGPT, this is where you ship integrations. It builds on MCP rather than replacing it.

Open spec file
AI ENGINEER FOUNDATION EST. 2024

Agent Protocol

Open Agent Protocol

Vendor-neutral REST API for invoking agents. Less momentum than MCP/A2A.

ADOPTION NICHE
WHY YOU CARE

Niche right now; could become relevant if vendor protocols fragment.

Open spec file
THE PROTOCOL WAR

Should you care?

Multiple competing protocols. Multiple vendors. Each pushing their own. Familiar story.

Honest take: MCP has the most momentum, the cleanest spec, and the broadest cross-vendor support — including from Microsoft and OpenAI. Apps SDK builds on MCP-style servers rather than replacing them. If you're building agents that need tools, default to MCP and only diverge when you have a specific reason.

A2A is interesting if you're orchestrating multiple agents. Apps SDK is essential if your audience is in ChatGPT. Don't over-think it; pick the one closest to your distribution channel and ship.

Adoption ratings here are editorial, not measured. They reflect a qualitative read of vendor support, production usage, and developer tooling activity at time of review.